No 80-page report, no abstract workshop. We analyse the real network, surface the risks that actually matter, and hand you a practical plan for what to do next.
Network spending and maintenance windows usually go on instinct: the loudest complaint, the last outage, whatever a vendor is selling. An assessment replaces instinct with a ranked, evidence-based picture: what to fix now, what to plan, and what can safely wait, so the money and the hours land where they genuinely cut risk.
The network changed over the years; the diagrams didn't. You can't prioritise what you can't see.
Dependencies and recent changes are hard to reconstruct under pressure, so effort goes to the symptom, not the cause.
The team knows architecture work is coming, but without a clear starting point the budget is a guess.
NIS2 and the IKT-Minimalstandard raise the bar, and you need to know where the real gaps are before you spend.
We focus on the technical and operational issues that decide security, resilience and maintainability, working from real network data, not interviews and spreadsheets alone.
The assessment creates usable clarity quickly, then turns that clarity into the next practical step.
We define scope, questions, constraints and the parts of the network that matter most.
Explorer-based discovery maps devices, topology and recent change context, read-only.
We review structure, resilience, operational quality and security posture from several angles.
We walk the findings through together, explain the tradeoffs and focus the next decisions.
You leave with a prioritised set of decisions: what to fix now, what to plan, and what can safely wait.
A usable picture of the network and its main dependencies: the map you can actually trust.
A focused summary of the structural and operational risks that matter most, ranked, not listed.
Recommendations that support real architecture, operations and investment decisions.
Assessment-led visibility work in a critical-infrastructure context under strong compliance pressure.
Explorer-based visibility, IT/OT architecture work and OT Connect design in a utility environment.
A lightweight assessment approach for industrial environments, with rapid technical value.
Through the visibility gained, we could immediately identify measures to improve network security and stability. The Explorer helps us segment the OT network, find errors faster during outages, and continuously track network expansion. This saves us a lot of time.
Typically 4–6 weeks, depending on scope and your team's availability. Speed is the point: it creates usable clarity quickly, without becoming a major project.
Yes. It is specifically built for OT and mixed IT/OT environments, where visibility is uneven and invasive methods aren't acceptable. Discovery is read-only: no agents, no SPAN ports.
No. Explorer is often used as part of the assessment, and its value carries forward if you continue with it, but nothing has to be bought up front.
It is grounded in real network data, focused on practical decisions, and designed to produce next steps rather than a generic report.
Real networks we have assessed, mapped and helped put right.
Fig. — assessmentLightweight, Explorer-based network assessments, delivered with two integration partners.
Read →
Fig. — spanning treeFinding the broadcast-storm loop in an OT network you didn't design.
Read →
Fig. — EniwaA regional energy utility's network, rebuilt around clear zones with a realistic migration path.
Read →If the current state of the network is unclear, every other project gets harder. A focused assessment gives you the priorities to move forward with confidence.
Request an assessment